On 09/03/2012 12:35 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/09/02 20:25, JD wrote:
On 09/02/2012 08:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 09:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
My take away from this is that absolutely nothing except a totally
disconnected machine in an impenetrable safe is uncrackable, even
Fedora machines. Some form of "AV" tool is called for as well as
routine checks with the various system check utilities. Even that
won't prevent 100% of all attempts from succeeding. But it will help.
Nothing is 100% bulletproof, there will always be some weakness. The
current state of play is to try an make sure that /that/ weakness isn't
exposed, rather than eliminate all the weaknesses (which isn't really
possible).
Yet, is it not amazing that with so many capable hackers
in the world poring over the open source software like Linux,
looking for these weaknesses have not publicized major
weaknesses that could cripple it - at least I have not been
jolted by such news in a long time.
It seems that the sheer size of the source code all of the free
open source software packages that comprise an installation
would be a powerful enough reason to make most such hackers
to grow quickly weary of such endeavor (to expose weaknesses).
Cheers,
JD
Guys, consider something for a moment. There are CERT advisories against
Linux (and most anything else) from time to time. Now, how were these
discovered? Was it experts pouring over the code, was it somebody got
cracked, discovered it, and reported it, or was it somebody noticed some
odd packets and analyzed the vulnerability they were designed to exploit?
Only one of those cases involves a Linux machine that was not cracked.
The rest mean a vulnerability has been found one way or another and
subsequently exploited or at least attempted in the wild.
Deploying more than a minimalist defense gives you a better chance of
not owning the first few systems that get exploited before the hole is
plugged. Even if the chances are one in a million you'll face an exploit
there if every person in Los Angeles owned a Linux machine that means
several people in Los Angeles would suffer a bad case of computer flu.
I have a "thing" about people who say you don't need an AV or other
defense with Linux, "It's safe." That's been a mantra of the know
nothings for nearly 20 years now. I've disagreed with it for nearly 20
years now. So when this juxtaposition of an attempted exploit coupled
with an advertisement on the site from which the attack took place
touting Fedora it sort of amused me leading me to share my amusement
with the list.
(And, as noted, passwords are the easiest hole to exploit on Linux if
the person leaves an SSH port "too open to the world." Thank heavens
for my iptables defensive trick. Only two people have figured out how
they can get more than one shot at logging into my system. And those I
found before they'd had even 100 tries. I locked out their entire
domain with a hard lock instead of the soft lockout that happens
automatically. And I STILL worry. I am paranoid, perhaps. "They"
certainly are out to get me. But it's not personal. They are out
to get anybody they can.)
{^_^}
So how would someone who's still a greenhorn to Linux protect their
machine?...I refuse to install anything that's going to "charge" me for
their product....(call it a glitch in my mental processes, but if I'm
going to use "Free Open Source Software" then it should be "free"...no?)
I cannot get a handle on ClamAV, it's too complicated for me, but I
haven't seen anything that's available for Linux....any advice?...
EGO II
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
