On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 01:50:04AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the hints. I'm meeting the admin in person tomorrow, > these comments will surely be useful. > This is just to update the list, the problem is indeed someone not following the regulations. As you can see from the output below, someone is running an entire (unapproved) network in their office. Probably they want WiFi since the official WiFi is pretty weak in our building. In the output below, 192.168.0.114 is the IP my laptop gets assigned. # nmap -sn 192.168.0.0-255 Starting Nmap 6.01 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-08-31 14:40 CEST Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.1 Host is up (0.00066s latency). MAC Address: C8:3A:35:5E:E3:90 (Tenda Technology Co.) Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.100 Host is up (0.33s latency). MAC Address: 88:30:8A:36:A9:2A (Murata Manufactuaring Co.) Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.104 Host is up (0.015s latency). MAC Address: 98:0C:82:64:FE:1B (Samsung Electro Mechanics) Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.114 Host is up. Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.118 Host is up (0.14s latency). MAC Address: 90:4C:E5:56:BF:03 (Hon Hai Precision Ind. Co.) Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.129 Host is up (0.060s latency). MAC Address: A8:26:D9:36:A6:1A (HTC) Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.196 Host is up (0.43s latency). MAC Address: 38:16:D1:83:46:B2 (Samsung Electronics Co.) Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (7 hosts up) scanned in 63.80 seconds Thanks for all the pointers and discussion. It was quite educational for me. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
