Am 05.08.2012 10:44, schrieb Patrick Dupre: >> I may be a serious problem. But it won't get addressed if you don't >> file a *detailed* bugzilla. On your F16 system, did you have /usr on >> a separate partition? > > Yes, > > I have / > /usr > /usr/lib > /usr/local > /home > > (Old fashion, like it was recommanded a while ago) a while? 30 years ago i guess! / and /home is strongly recommanded to be seperated a seperate /usr is USELESS because it makes no sense on a single machine but what do people recommend this think happens if multiple machines share /usr while their /var/lib/rpm is drifting away whati never have ssen in my life before is that someone seperates /usr AND below this /usr/lib and /usr/local and you do wonder that UsrMove fails? seriously? > Yes I have a backup, but it would better to undertsand before reinstalling again > because this failure is reproducible. In fact probably very little need to repaired. > I have other machines to update. you have only to understand that seperate /usr is useless and NOT SUPPORTED since a very long time, one theoretical goal of the UsrMove is to make it supported again, but NOT how you made it with split /usr on another partition in 2 additional pieces
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
