Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jack Craig <jack.craig.aptos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Typical M$ thinking, and within recent history, SCO!!
Thing did not go very well for SCO in the end.
Why is this not being brought into a courtroom, rather than companies just paying licenses?
Why is this not being brought into a courtroom, rather than companies just paying licenses?
Litigation, a sure death trap...On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Skunk Worx <skunkworx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Uh oh...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/25/microsoft_patent_deal_amdocs/
"Microsoft has claimed since 2007 that more than 235 of its patents are violated by the open source operating system Linux, while critics claim Redmond has a cynical eye on the project as another source of revenue."
Between the "Android Tax" and this, indemnification licensing appears to be the only way to protect linux users from themselves.
Oracle Linux Network : $119 per system, per year.
RedHat Desktop : $49 per system, per year (minimum).
RedHat Server : $349 per system, per year (minimum).
---
John
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org