Hi, >> created route-p2p1 >> >> with the content... >> >> 192.168.1.0/24 dev p2p1 >> >> And on reboot.... >> >> [egreshko@f17 ~]$ netstat -rn >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface >> 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 p2p1 >> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 p2p1 >> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 p2p1 >> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 p2p1 >> >> So, it should work for you too..... > > It didn't. Not only was there no static route, but there was no routes > whatsoever. > > There must be something else on your system that's creating that > static route for you. Perhaps some remnants of NetworkManager? > > I have a /29, and other than that, the configuration is the same as yours. > > This is also something that can't really be done remotely. The moment > I saved the route-eth0 file, I lost network connectivity. What is it To follow up with my previous post, actually, it does work. I didn't realize it, but NetworkManager was indeed installed and running. My experience in the past was that it wasn't configured with a "minimal" install. What's the proper way to switch from NetworkManager to the standard "network" format? I've just removed the NetworkManager packages, and it seems to work, but perhaps there's some configuration option I'm missing? Thanks, Alex -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
