On 08.07.2012, suvayu ali wrote: > PS: If you are wondering, what I took from the thread, it's going to be > a pain if at some point the optional requirement to secure boot is > removed. This reminds me on the past, before the mainboard/BIOS manufacturers picked it up as an sales-idea: people (overclockers)had to search for, download and flash/burn a modified BIOS for their mainboards to get access to CPU- memory- and busclock settings. Now you can buy mainboards which even have "dynamic overclocking", and nearly all BIOSes contain a bunch of tunables to shoot yourself in the foot. I have no difficulties to imagine a similar scenario, where people buy their mainboard because they know that a modified BIOS exists for, which reinforces the "disable secure boot"... -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
