On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Robert Myers <rbmyersusa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Flash actually works for Windows, and I need Flash (I know...pathetic, isn't >> it?) > > Adobe gets in bed with Google to promote Chrome and makes Flash > available on Chrome only and this is a fault of Fedora or Linux, > exactly HOW? and how do you suppose the Fedora team could fix it, > technilcally, if Flash is closed source and Adobe doesn't make a > version available? > It should have been clear, but I suppose I must state it explicitly, that I do not care either for Adobe or for Flash, but I have no choice but to use them, which means that Fedora cannot be my primary OS. If Fedora had showed anything but dithering on dom0 virtualization, I might consider Fedora as a primary OS with Windows as an expensive guest. >> Vmware Player for Windows, unlike Red Hat's various experiments with >> virtualization, actually works in a way I can use. > > That's why I use Virtualbox. You should try it. > There is clearly some virtualization scheme that will work, even if Fedora has so far failed to deliver it in a way that I could use. Robert Myers. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
