-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/20/2012 05:43 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > What ajax seems to be saying is that it is not realistic to > include every possible choice in a given distribution. I agree. > There are desktop environments available for Linux that are not > shipped with Fedora, and one cannot reasonably complain about that. > But you still have the choice to use a different distro that > provides the choices you want if you are not satisfied with the > choices that one distro includes. > > I don't think the problem is necessarily about saying that "Linux > is about choice", but about expectations that this means every > possible choice should be available in your favorite distro. Yep, I'd say that's a good summary of my take on it too. Linux (or rather open source) gives you almost unending choice /if/ you are willing to devote the time and energy, or otherwise pay the costs to make everything "Just So" for your own tastes. On the other hand in a distribution like Fedora that aims to have broad appeal and usefulness and has limited resources to throw at things you need to take a more pragmatic line to end up with something on-time and within cost constraints. Regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/iArUACgkQ6YSQoMYUY94JsgCfaVpFJo57LketEgudULA6kg2e BIYAmwYq0rofP3EDofQE/WAWytu5CmBU =E1iC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
