Re: git and selinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2012 07:08 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote:
PS>> I'm trying to setup a git server on a Fedora
PS>> 17 box.  I created  user name git and setup
PS>> bare Git repos under /home/git/repos.  When
PS>> I clone these repos from another machine using
PS>>
PS>> $ git clone git@server_name/repos/RepoName.git RepoName
PS>>
PS>> selinux wants the type of /home/git to be user_home_t.
PS>>
PS>> When I try to use http for read-only, public
PS>> access using
PS>>
PS>> $ git clone http://server_name/git/RepoName.git RepoName
PS>>
PS>> I'm not sure what to do to use both.
PS>>
PS>> A few versions of Fedora ago, I would get
PS>> sealert entries in some log (/var/log/messages ?)
PS>> that would give me hints on how to fix this type
PS>> of problem.  Is that still available?

On 6/12/2012 5:15 AM, DW = Daniel J Walsh wrote:
DW> Well, we have default labeling for git stores in
DW> /var/lib/git>
DW>
DW> matchpathcon /var/lib/git
DW> /var/lib/git	system_u:object_r:git_sys_content_t:s0
DW>
DW> # semanage fcontext -a -t git_sys_content_t "/home/git(/.*)?"
DW> # restorecon -R -v /home/git/
DW>
DW> I think will solve your problem.  Or move you
DW> content to /var/lib/git.

I followed the simple version of a git server setup suggested in

http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-on-the-Server-Setting-Up-the-Server

It seems like any blog or book with these types of instructions completely ignore selinux.

This technique creates a git user and places public keys for developers with commit privileges under /home/git/.ssh/authorized_keys. When this type of developer checks out the code using

$ git clone git@server_name/repos/RepoName.git RepoName

will you advice work?

In other words, does git_sys_content_t allow http and ssh protocol access, or just hit protocol access.

It sounds like I'm being critical, but I'm not. I just don't understand all of the issues and was able to fix the problem using

# setsebool -P httpd_enable_homedirs 1
# setsebool -P httpd_read_user_content 1

Was that a bad way to go?

Also, is setroubleshoot still a recommended tool or it audit2* the way to go?

It's always good to hear from the selinux expert.

Thanks,
Pete
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux