On 06/11/2012 10:23 PM, William Hooper wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Caution is always advisable, of course. But could you name one package that is known >> to linger or needs to be left untouched? > $rsync -r rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/17/Everything/i386/os/Packages/ > | grep fc16 | wc -l > 123 > > It looks like a number of the packages are noarch. > Yes, they fall into the #2 category mentioned in another post. Rereading what I said the above I can see my meaning wasn't clear. What I was trying to point out is that I don't believe there to be any F16 package with a corresponding F17 package that needs/should be left at F16 after an upgrade. -- Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on the joke of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
