On 06/02/2012 08:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
No....really....
Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will not return
an error.
An unsigned rpm will simply return the name of the rpm.
A signed rpm will return information about the signing key.
Here is an rpm from OpenSuse....
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qp glibc-2.9-4.6.i686.rpm
warning: glibc-2.9-4.6.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 307e3d54: NOKEY
glibc-2.9-4.6.i686
Here is an rpm that I build and did not sign.
[egreshko@meimei i686]$ rpm -qp gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686.rpm
gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686
You can even try with -qpvv and get more details. On the rpm that is not signed
you'd see....
D: gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686.rpm: Header SHA1 digest: OK
(954c4933349557bacb137d0b6b6d6db0f2096032)
gedit-3.0.5-1.fc15.i686
on a signed rpm for which the key exists in key store you'd see
D: zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID
a82ba4b7: OK
zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686
on a signed rpm for which the key doesn't exist in key store you'd see
D: Actual size: 1573302
warning: glibc-2.9-4.6.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 307e3d54: NOKEY
glibc-2.9-4.6.i686
Notice the difference between "OK" and "NOKEY"?
But Ed, as I replied to another OP,
I mounted an old fc14 dd image, I copied the src rpm to
the fc14 mount point's /tmp, I chrooted to the mount point
and ran rpm -qlp, and it worked just fine. All the files were
listed.
No error messages at all.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
