On 05/31/2012 03:09 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
So, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I just can't believe that it's as simply a matter of paying $99 once, no matter what your submitted bootloader does, or doesn't do.
AIUI, that fee isn't to get your arbitrary boot loader signed, it's to *gain access* to the certification process. Presumably you still have to have your code audited to make sure that it does what it says it does and only what it says it does. Still, I'd be a lot happier if the certification were done by a neutral third-party instead of by a corporation with the anti-competitive reputation that MS has.
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
