> Grub(2). This is signed by the fedora keys. It checks the signature of > the kernel against the fedora keys. > | > v > Kernel No - this is insufficient. The kernel must also be locked down, check every module, disallow iopl3() [ie some X features], disallow ioperm for most ports, prevent any user even root from loading their own kernel modules etc. It's of course all a bit of a joke because it's then a simple matter of using virtualisation to fake the "secure" environment and running the "secure" OS in that 8) > No. I would assume the Fedora project pays the $99, and then distrubtes > the signed bootloader component, with the fedora keys built in. I don't believe that would be compliant with the Fedora Project definitions of freedom. Alan -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
