On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 26.05.2012 07:45, schrieb Joel Rees: >>>> Do you understand the reason you still set up swap, even though your >>>> entire workload working set fits into RAM? >>> >>> there is no single reason if you have enough RAM >> >> In an ideal world, RAM would not consume energy. >> >> This is a real world, what energy I have on the train is a small >> Lithium ion battery. > > why in the world do you wake up this thread after weeks again? The after three weeks part is that I have a day job and a night job, and trying to keep up with the mailing list is not top priority for me. The wake it up part, I guess, is that I really, really think hibernate is important. And technical accuracy is also important to me. You contribute some good things to the list, Riendl, but your field of vision seems severely limited to your own working set. And some of the things you say (nothing but greedy RAM policies in any Unix-like OS? No reason to use a low-power netbook running Fedora on the train?) are just plain wrong. -- Joel Rees -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
