On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Edik Landaveri <elwanka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:02:24PM -0400, David wrote: >> On 5/11/2012 8:55 PM, Edik Landaveri wrote: > >> You do understand that the reason Flash gets updates is to patch >> security holes and bugs? >> >> To go 'backwards' to solve a viewing problem opens you to those old >> security attacks. >> >> Look for the solution and repair your problem. It is a really bad idea, >> normally, to downgrade to an know bad application. >> >> -- >> >> David > > Yes but allowing the flash plugin to have text relocation is > a potential security problem. Most libraries do not need this permission. > Libraries are sometimes coded incorrectly --Thanks Adobe who no longer will maintain its > linux releases except for Chrome. > > I rather trust my SELinux security context rather than an proprietary company :-< I can understand that. :-) The only problem with the last Flash for Linux, that I have seen talked about was a green screen tint with Nvidia cards. Perhaps this will spur on the Linux Flash project. Gnash I think it is called. Or perhaps HTML5 will get going. Good luck. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
