On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:41 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Andre Robatino > <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm not sure what else to do. The Flash plugin > > was updated to 11.2.202.235 about a week ago. This is a security update. But > > their yum repos (both i386 and x86_64) still have 11.2.202.233. I filed > > https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3185733 and they promptly > > closed it as NotABug. There is an updated RPM at > > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ under ".rpm for other Linux" but I'm not sure > > if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case, > > providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could > > people please vote for my bug in the hope of getting someone at Adobe to wake > > up? Thanks. > > Adobe drops Flash for Linux except in Google Chrome > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Adobe-Drops-Flash-for-Linux-Except-in-Google-Chrome-254483.shtml > > Maybe this has something to do? > > FC This is strange because of the adobe website they advertise a linux flash-plugin later than the one I can install from the F16 adobe.repo. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
