> If you really would like to get output in sequence, write to a pipe, and > have a reader process drain the pipe to a logfile. It's pretty easy; > look at "mknod" with the 'p' option, or "mkfifo". I'd still suggest > tagging each output line with an identifier and sequence number. > For the sake of the argument, assume I echo 500 As, 500 Bs and 500 Cs. I don't care which process the output is coming from. It doesn't matter which order the As, Bs and Cs are output. All I care about is that I don't get 349As followed by 245Bs, etc. I want to see blocks of 500 each. I don't see how echoing into a pipe would change the problem. Theoretically, if several processes (e.g. echo) are running in the background, e.g. on a round robin basis, then potentially I could see random sequences of As, Bs and Cs. It doesn't seem to be the case in practice though. So which is it? This has to do with the operating system internals, it's not a trivial question. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
