On 4/7/2012 6:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 07.04.2012 23:41, schrieb Sam Sharpe: >> Fascinating as these headers are, lets look back at the headers >> of the message Fernando replied to and you called him out for bad >> etiquette: >> >> To: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: >> phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Community support for Fedora users >> <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Do you acknowledge that those headers, when replying might cause >> you to send your reply to three addresses? > > no > > this would only mean reply to "phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" and not > additionally to two other addressess > > but as MULTIPLE explained: > > is is in the responsible of the HUMAN who press "send" to verify > that the RCPT is what he want and not act blindly > > what you also stil do not realize is that my topic change was not > because ONE single message, it was caused by get way too much > useless copies all over the time > > >> This is you I presume: >> http://www.rhsoft.net/show_content.php?sid=2 > > yes > >> This is me: http://www.linkedin.com/in/samsharpe > > and now? > >> Given that one of us is a senior engineer for a rather large >> managed hosting company and probably spends 50% of his time >> dealing with mail issues for thousands of customers and the other >> one is you, precisely what is your grounds for calling me >> ignorant of mail issues? Actually don't answer that, I probably >> don't care what you think as it will probably be a long message >> about how I am wrong. > > who do you think you are? > > i try to prevent get personal now but let's said one thing > > my expierience in the last years is that as larger the copmany and > as more titles a person has the real knowledge is directly the > opposite > > so no, you can not impress me with any reference and the fact that > you stil do not understand why "reply all" is idiotic (to say it > clear) shows that you are one more of the "big but failing" > > is it really so hard to understand that my intention was to educate > people that "reply all" in context of mailing-lists is ALWAYS wrong > and taht the fact that i get TWO messages twice from Fernando which > was no direct reply to me was the reason to say "now it is > enough"? > > if you still think "reply all" is the correct method to reply ona > mailing-list please do not reply any more and leave me fuck in > peace because you are a perfect example for "learning resistent" > and i have really better things to do as explain such people again > and again basics Honest to goodness people! There are some people that will never let the truth, the facts, or reality interfere with what they have been told to believe. -- David -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
