Am 07.04.2012 21:08, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 21:04:38 +0200, > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> well, reply is enough to act correct >> each list-message has a "Reply-To"-header > > No each list doesn't have that. Many Fedora lists do. so what, we are speaking about this list and possible excuses which are not valid for this list > Doing this (lists munging reply-to headers) is also a bad idea, as it breaks > the reply to sender function. ok, you are really learning resistent and yes, this is a polite statement set reply-to headers is for people who are unable for "reply-to-list" by their bad mail-program or ignorance the normal mail-flow in a list is send and reply only to the list, if you really want to reply off-list for whatever reason you should be able to copy the address manually or not use email at all really: now this thread reaches for me the point of personal anger and frustration because it is a mix of ignorance and stupid argumentation for one of the simplest things in the world namely press "reply" instead "reply all" which is only suiteable in offlist communictaion where many people are involved but at least unacceptable as standard-actions on mailing-lists please: subscribe to postfix list and press 3 times "reply all" and after that report what answers you get compared with this i am really polite because there are usually advanced mail-users and mailserver admins with ZERO understanding for argumentations like yours
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
