Hiisi wrote: > On 2 April 2012 17:12, Frantisek Hanzlik <franta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think when in future distros will be 1) some Gmome2 fork, >> 2) instead of systemd upstart/sysvinit again (or as option >> in conjunction with), and 3) all will not be drived by >> NetworkManager, then Fedora will be usable promptly after >> release again. UID/GID increase is IMO OK, and grub2 >> implementation will be sufficiently good soon. >> >> Franta > > What's wrong about network manager? Personally, I don't use it. To > delete it is the first thing to do after a fresh install. I use it on laptops and there reasonably works. But on several machines with multiple interfaces when I omit uninstall it, I ends with unaccessible machine where was cripled interface settings or routing tables - although these was configured as static and routing with proper route-IFACE and rule-IFACE files. And this occurred even when NM was not installed, but install after update, when some updated package depend on it. Franta -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
