Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 03:30 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > >> KerTeX is not the one being reviewed or is it? > > KerTeX is just another packaging of all the components that have been > collected around TeX and LaTeX. It's not the packaging that's of > concern here, it's the individual components. I'm sure including KerTeX > would involve the same audit process. > > On the other hand, getting the TeXLive audit done will benefit KerTeX as > well, as everything that's common to the two collections will have been > properly vetted. Exactly, and in particular, any complaint about items removed from texlive due to this would apply equally to any KerTeX fedora packaging as well. -- rex -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
