On 24/02/12 06:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:33:44 -0500, BG (Bob) wrote:
yum -y install sane-backends-drivers-scanners
Did that, still no device found!
If the scanner is plugged in, what do you get when running
the /usr/bin/sane-find-scanner command in a terminal?
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x1909, chip=GL124?)
at libusb:001:006
# Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not
be supported by
# SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage.
However for the first time ever I ignored the warning not to run
as root and xsane found the Canon LIDE-110 scanner and copied as
expected! A permissions problem?
Very likely. If you run "lsusb" as root with the scanner being plugged in,
what Bus/Device numbers does it print? For example:
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
^^^ ^^^
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110
If you then substitute your Bus/Device numbers in the following command
appropriately, what do you get when you execute it?
getfacl /dev/bus/usb/001/004
^^^ ^^^
(!)
[bobg@box6 ~]$ getfacl /dev/bus/usb/001/006
getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
# file: dev/bus/usb/001/006
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rw-
group::rw-
other::r--
[bobg@box6 ~]$ ll /dev/bus/usb/001/006
crw-rw-r--. 1 root root 189, 5 Feb 24 05:18 /dev/bus/usb/001/006
Do I need to chown bobg here? It looks like it ought to work as
is for bobg with 664 ownership?
As a matter of interest, my installs are from the XFCE spin on a
Which may be an important detail. There's another list for XFCE:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/
It could be that the XFCE Spin is missing something in its setup.
Ok will look there later.
Thank you.
Bob
.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
