On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:53:54 +0100, RC (Ralf) wrote: > On 02/14/2012 10:28 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:21:05 +0100, HD (Heinz) wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> seems like alsa-lib update is broken, does anybody see the same with F16? > > > > *sigh* > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1025/alsa-lib-1.0.25-1.fc16 > > > >> Guess there isn't any alsa-lib package>= 1.0.25 in F16 updates. > > > > There is, but the ALSA maintainer has not put all packages into a single > > update ticket, so the inter-dependencies break as individual packages > > get moved from updates-testing to stable while others are not moved yet. > Wasn't this kind of bugs supposed to be caught by AutoQA? It caught it, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1132/alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16 but obviously only after the automatic request to push it to stable, and it does not stop such updates automatically yet. I don't know if the AutoQA results are being actively monitored by anyone (from time to time there are false positives). -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
