Thank you again Reindl.
Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list. Sorry,to bother you Friend.
What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck those packages which has ending as "*.fc17" .The rest packages with updates(*.fc16) are fine in updating.
But Friend,please help me with this:
[root@localhost kgtaban]# yum update
Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, dellsysid, downloadonly, etckeeper,
: fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot, fusioninventory-agent, keys, langpacks,
: list-data, local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions, presto, priorities,
: protectbase, ps, puppetverify, refresh-packagekit, refresh-updatesd, remove-with-
: leaves, rpm-warm-cache, security, show-leaves, tmprepo, tsflags, upgrade-helper,
: verify, versionlock
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
updates-debuginfo/metalink | 5.6 kB 00:00
* fedora: fedora.iitm.ac.in
* fedora-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp
* fedora-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp
* rpmfusion-free: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-free-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-free-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-free-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-nonfree-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* updates: fedora.iitm.ac.in
* updates-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp
* updates-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp
rpmfusion-free-updates-debuginfo | 2.7 kB 00:00
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-debuginfo | 2.7 kB 00:00
updates-debuginfo | 3.1 kB 00:00
updates-debuginfo/primary_db | 328 kB 00:02
Skipping filters plugin, no data
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
Skipping filters plugin, no data
--> Running transaction check
---> Package mplayer-doc.x86_64 0:1.0-0.126.20110816svn.fc16 will be updated
---> Package mplayer-doc.x86_64 0:1.0-0.128.20110816svn.fc17 will be an update
---> Package npapi-vlc.x86_64 0:1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc16 will be updated
---> Package npapi-vlc.x86_64 0:1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17 will be an update
---> Package python-vlc.noarch 0:1.1.0-2.20100825git.fc14 will be updated
---> Package python-vlc.noarch 0:1.1.0-3.20100825git.fc17 will be an update
---> Package qtractor.x86_64 0:0.5.2-1.fc16 will be updated
---> Package qtractor.x86_64 0:0.5.2-1.fc17 will be an update
---> Package vlc-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.13-3.fc16 will be updated
---> Package vlc-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.13-74.fc16 will be an update
--> Processing Dependency: vlc = 1.1.13 for package: vlc-devel-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package vlc.x86_64 0:1.1.13-74.fc16 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libgoom2.so.0()(64bit) for package: vlc-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libmpcdec.so.6()(64bit) for package: vlc-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libxosd.so.2()(64bit) for package: vlc-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libgoom2.x86_64 0:0-3.fc16 will be installed
---> Package musepack-tools.x86_64 0:sv8-3.svn435.fc16 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libcuefile.so.0()(64bit) for package: musepack-tools-sv8-3.svn435.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libreplaygain.so.1()(64bit) for package: musepack-tools-sv8-3.svn435.fc16.x86_64
---> Package xosd.x86_64 0:2.2.14-14.fc15 will be installed
--> Running transaction check
---> Package cuetools.x86_64 0:1.4.0-0.7.svn305.fc16 will be installed
---> Package libreplaygain.x86_64 0:0.9.1-0.1.svn453.fc16 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
=====================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=====================================================================================================
Updating:
mplayer-doc x86_64 1.0-0.128.20110816svn.fc17 _local 1.5 M
npapi-vlc x86_64 1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17 _local 50 k
python-vlc noarch 1.1.0-3.20100825git.fc17 _local 58 k
qtractor x86_64 0.5.2-1.fc17 _local 1.0 M
vlc-devel x86_64 1.1.13-74.fc16 _local 143 k
Installing for dependencies:
cuetools x86_64 1.4.0-0.7.svn305.fc16 _local 56 k
libgoom2 x86_64 0-3.fc16 _local 78 k
libreplaygain x86_64 0.9.1-0.1.svn453.fc16 _local 8.4 k
musepack-tools x86_64 sv8-3.svn435.fc16 _local 108 k
vlc x86_64 1.1.13-74.fc16 _local 9.1 M
xosd x86_64 2.2.14-14.fc15 _local 47 k
Transaction Summary
=====================================================================================================
Install 6 Packages
Upgrade 5 Packages
Total download size: 12 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 39 MB/s | 12 MB 00:00
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY
Public key for npapi-vlc-1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not installed
[root@localhost kgtaban]#
How do I proceed regarding the above matter?
Thanks to all Fedora Friends.
-Kaushik
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 28.01.2012 06:11, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" reposwhy were they enabled?
this is a road to hell!
only if you want to kill yur system over the long
> What about the "ATrpms" repositories? I've disabled it
> earlier...should I enable it?
ATrpms is known to replace base-packages with own versions
and sometimes other packaging (sub-packages) as the original
one and sooner or later this will end in massive depsolv
troubles - the only good at ATrpms is that after some time
if you want get rid of the troubles you are learning
how to deal with "rpm -e --nodpes" and what packages
you must not remove and after all that you know all
core packages by her first name (i was there years ago)
you should avoid to enable as much repos as you can find
in case of repos "more helps more" is totally wrong
your current problems are coming from enable things you
are not knowing what they are (rawhide as best example)
rawhide is the devel-tree and currently F17 and was
never designed for machines which should work all the time
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
