Re: Neal Becker Software Package..?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012/01/07 15:24, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 02:01 PM, jdow wrote:

Seriously, Joe, you miss his point. Forget the login straw man. That is not
the issue. The issue is the clumsy navigation to get to 20 different fora
and then to each new thread you are interested in, which few forums
remember
for you.

As I may have written before, I've never found web fora to be the slightest bit
clumsy, unless whoever set it up went out of their way to make it so. In fact, I
rather enjoy going to a support forum and browsing through the various boards
looking for threads I might find interesting. If you don't like them, don't use
them, but there are enough people using them, IMAO, to prove that they're not
useless for everybody. And, the main reason I made a point out of the login
issue was to show that it wasn't true for most people, eliminating it, I hoped,
from the list of reasons to avoid them.

Some fora are very nice for that once in a while browsing activity. Most are
dreadful, like the Mozilla fora structure. You often can easily find a dozen
people asking the same question and no answers. The Avira forums are support
for the manufacturer and are heavily monitored by people who know what they
are doing. Finding answers there is not a bad experience. Mailing lists are
often murder in that regard. If you want to follow the buzz, as I do for many
mailing lists, the mailing list approach is far better in that it requires
less "page loading delay" than a forum does. Mailing lists also tend to pull
in more peer to peer help than you might find in fora. More people at least
read the questions.

This is why I think a hybrid approach would be good. The mailing list
archives for this group could get organized more as a forum and benefit
greatly, I suspect. It would require a team of moderators to group message
topics in a multiple-hierarchical structure by type of problem and the portion
of the distribution's contents that are affected. (A given bug might fall
under selinux and samba, for example.) Then you could maintain a "never delete"
sort of structure with things like this topic has drifted towards falling into
a water-cooler sort of topic head.

(Just off hand my mind cringes imagining the LKML structured as a forum.)
{^_^}
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux