Reindl Harald napsal(a): > Am 31.12.2011 14:28, schrieb Frantisek Hanzlik: >> Reindl Harald napsal(a): >>> >>> >>> Am 31.12.2011 13:29, schrieb Frantisek Hanzlik: >>>> Has anyone experience with situation, when all users on Fedora >>>> distro have same primary group (i.e. is not created extra group >>>> for every user? >>>> >>>> Namely I'm asking when all programs will be working without problems. >>> >>> programs are not interested on this detail >>> applications have the needed permissions or not >>> >>> and yes, it works using only one users-group or mix users >>> andgroups in any way you want, this is how it is desgined >>> to do and having eahc user in a own group in my opinion >>> is a dumb default >> >> I understand how permission works and that *most* apps should work >> fine. But, are not any (perhaps system or desktop environment), >> which depends e.g. "/etc/login.defs" defined "GID_MIN" variable? >> Or have some GID boundaries hard-compiled (something as suexec has)? >> Or when may be some SELINUX problems here? > > what have "/etc/login.defs" to do with the fact that there is > simply no need to have a personal group for a user at all? Nothing, of course. I'm saying rather about value of "users" group - when problem will not be in value "100"; when it is safely usable. I'm sure when I use this common GID >=500 (>=1000 in F16+) then there will not be any problem. But what when using GID=100 (although this GID was historically used for these purposes)? I'm not knowing when Fedora implement some own restriction about these "normal users" UID/GID values. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
