On Saturday 24 December 2011 01:13:56 Joe Zeff wrote: > On 12/23/2011 11:34 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > That's not exactly true. The radiation is quite easy to measure, and > > there is no need for increased sensitivity of the detectors. > > It all depends on which radiation you're talking about. There was talk > in the early days after the quake and tsunami about detecting > radioisotopes crossing the Pacific, with the implication that the US > West Coast was in danger of major contamination. What was actually > detected were minute traces that wouldn't have triggered the detectors > in use at the time of Chernobyl. That's what I was referring to, and > I'll admit in hindsight that I should have been more specific. Ah, ok. Measuring radiation levels on site and measuring migrated radioisotopes on the other side of the globe are two completely different games. :-) Best, :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
