On 22.12.2011 10:51, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/22/2011 10:06 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> On 22.12.2011 07:27, Joe Zeff wrote: >>> On 12/21/2011 11:10 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>>> I would call it a functional regression having been introduce during by >>>> the sysvinit/upstart->systemd transition. >>>> >>>> If it has not been BZ'd before, it should be BZ'ed. >>> >>> I wouldn't mind being the reporter, but I'd like to know if anybody else sees >>> this or not. I'll try to find time to fire up my laptop tomorrow and check there >>> as well, but I'd also appreciate it if the rest of you would check and let me know >>> if it's been off. >> >> this si all correct >> >> but normally you should make a list which services are running >> before the upgrade and verify that there are none missing after >> the upgrade or services you did disable before were silently >> enabled again > > I would expect an upgrade to preserve those service which were running before > the upgrade. This is what upgrading to systemd was supposed to do. The fact it > doesn't therefore qualifies as a bug. yes it is a bug yes you expect correct but YES if you administrate a system you are repsonsible to verify your expectations!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
