On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 23:09 +0000, Pedro Francisco wrote: >> Right thread though, > > May be (as few of us can remember the origins of this thread), but > you've replied at the wrong point. By this time the conversation has > changed, and your reply has nothing to do with the message that you've > replied to. And that's what replies should be (one message in reply to > another *particular* message). You need to go further back, and make > your reply to the right place. It's the only way that it'll make any > sense to anybody reading it. I'm not following your point. I replied to the first message, the one which started the thread. I did make a mistake and top-posted, which damaged the context but if you are reading the mailing list on Thunderbird or some other mail client which supports threaded view, you'll see I replied to the right message. You can argue that to those who read in Gmail and such the message will appear at the bottom. That is a valid point but I can't do anything about it besides bottom-posting to keep the context. I saw a bad review, quickly scanned the thread to see if anyone else had seen a pattern on what was working badly (networking related) and decided to add my information, namely the peripheral possibly responsible and a possible solution which I'm occasionaly working on. There was no other solution for me to do what I did, except to avoid the top-posting which indeed was an error on my part. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
