At Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:09:07 +0000, Pedro Francisco wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 19:25 +0000, Pedro Francisco wrote: > > > Just to add that laptop has iwl3945 wireless card; iwl3945 module has > > > had > > > > Wrong thread I think (not to mention the top-posting). > > > Thanks for the top-posting tip. > > Right thread though, he bashed things related to networking. He > mentioned he's using a T60p to test Fedora 16 so since T60p has an > Intel Wireless 3945 his wireless network performance is going to be > awful. That alone is sufficient to ruin a review. Indeed, the performance with current iwl3945 is unsatisfactory to say the least. I've filed a bug report here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753299 as the link throughput was stuck at 100kBps. Apparently enabling hardware scanning helps. However, once enabled, there will be occasional lockups due to scanning, which can be prevented by hardcoding AP SSID in the wireless settings. So yeah, more and more things start to suck over time (not mentioning terrible 2D graphics performance, deteriorating with each release since KMS/Gallium inception). -- Maciek Borzecki -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
