> You have zero basis for such assumptions and even if that > is the case, > licensing conflicts will always triumph code quality > consideration since > if a code cannot be included, there is no point in talking > about how > stable or buggy it is. > It is Fedora's legal position > that cdrkit has a > licensing issue. It has a licensing issue? I thought it was included because the original was the one that had the issue? or did you make a mistake here? > It is the same position > held by all other major > distributions as well. > > -- Slackware is a major distribution. It includes original cdrtools :) http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html Slackware Slackware ships the original cdrtools and does not even ship the broken fork. I also use it and it comes with the original, there's a slackbuild from Patrick V.. So others like source based distros also have it. Nobody has sued them. I have built packages for slax-remix & porteus using the slackbuild without problems. Regards, Antonio -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
