On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Jim <binarynut@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I can't tell from the messages output you posted if your machine is >> x86_64 or not but I had a very very similar issue with a Samsung >> scx4500w when I installed f16. >> >> It turned out that the copy of the file "rastertosamsungspl" was a 32 >> bit version and I had installed a 64 bit system - worth checking ? >> >> Also I notice that the name of your file is "rastertosamsungsplc" >> whereas it should be "rastertosamsungspl" i.e. you have an additional >> letter "c" at the end of the filename - if your file is really ending >> in a "c" then check whether you have the correct 32 or 64 bit file - >> if not then make sure that where you defined the file in the printer >> setup is correct - if not then redefine it with the correct filename. > I have a 32 bit box, > How do I determine wether the rastertosamungsplc is 32 or 64 bit? > In usr/lib/cups/filter/ there is a rastertosamsungsplc and a > rastertosamsungspl . > This is the same driver that I used Fedora 14 and 15 . OK - the answer as to which of 32 or 64 bit is where you got the file from? Presumably it is from the unified driver set from Samsung - in which case that will have difference directories for the 32bit and 64 bit file sets - one thing you can do is go back there and check the total file size - the 32 and 64 bit raster files are different sizes - which does yours match? Secondly you did not answer the question about using the correct name for the file when you defined the printer in Fedora - unless you changed the name of the actual file then the fail message indicated that you had the wrong filename - if course if you define it and point to a non-existent file then it is bound to fail! Check that again and see if that is the source of the problem. -- mike c -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
