The site http://legacy.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/ has some old Red Hat Linux content. Unfortunately, it's very incomplete. I have archives of the install discs going back at least to RH 7.0. (I started on RH 6.0 so might have something older around.) I was able to read off all of these, which have the following md5sums. There are discrepancies between them and the ones listed on the archive site. For example, for RH 9, the archive site has a signed checksum file which shows 34048ce4cd069b624f6e021ba63ecde5 shrike-i386-disc1.iso while my md5sum for RH9_1of3.iso is 400c7fb292c73b793fb722532abd09ad. Googling for my md5sum indicates that it is correct. So why does the RH9 signed checksum file (which, although the signature is good, was signed on 2003/09/11, months after RH9's release) have a different checksum? There are similar discrepancies for other ISOs. 626b7d18033e320c27c8cd58cc37a288 RH7.0_1of2.iso c9899d398ca675c1e80a7bdb68d701bf RH7.0_2of2.iso 596b1575773e88e066326f6741312a6f RH7.1_1of2.iso f27b912299572a542cd663b712444445 RH7.1_2of2.iso cf7bce0c1cdbfedfae29e60aef202f6f RH7.2_1of2.iso fd705b3e5d0e37a828db35d21195a9f6 RH7.2_2of2.iso cb91810ce8173039fed24420407e4c59 RH7.3_1of3.iso ec1b813d32ffdc8edc2be261735d17de RH7.3_2of3.iso 5dc81ce523cfddf99b4d4d63e91bcaa7 RH7.3_3of3.iso d7b16b081c20708dc0dd7d41793a4177 RH8.0_1of5.iso 2df17bc02cb1b3316930ed4f7601ad9e RH8.0_2of5.iso 305d6ff5b5850fa316276710a148b0a3 RH8.0_3of5.iso 0a77d7a3bc8c4e87508c46a2670242eb RH8.0_4of5.iso 8dbcf16f0072ee47db49b08921a41ba5 RH8.0_5of5.iso 88b9baba392b02b534a6fa546bcae3de RH8.0_docs.iso 400c7fb292c73b793fb722532abd09ad RH9_1of3.iso 6b8ba42f56b397d536826c78c9679c0a RH9_2of3.iso af38ac4316ba20df2dec5f990913396d RH9_3of3.iso -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
