I do agree that installing it by default is a mistake, however, IMHO you're taking it far too seriously - I simply made a habit of removing it as my first post install step.
Sorry for the top post,
- Gilboa
On Saturday, October 15, 2011, JB <jb.1234abcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gilboa Davara <gilboad <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> > $ dmesh --help
>> > bash: /usr/libexec/pk-command-not-found: No such file or directory
>
>> Have you tried restarting bash? (Closing and restarting the terminal usually
>> works for me)
>
> Good suggestion in this case.
>
> $ dmesh --help
> bash: dmesh: command not found
>
> Still, PackageKit (if present) interferes with shell, badly !
>
> I can not understand why PackageKit devs try to impregnate this, everybody
> says, UNIX-like OS ?
> It is not a business of PackageKit to meddle in shell's matters.
>
> This is not a bug, this is a silly feature of PackageKit.
> It should not be in it in the first place.
> It has been discussed on the list at time of F13 and rejected by users.
> I have reported it to PackageKit devs a year ago.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641311
> Result ?
>
> JB
>
> On Abstinence
> Rick Perry Struggles to answer Question on Abstinence
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
--
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
