On 10/11/2011 02:17 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:09:29 -0500 Christoph Wickert > <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, den 11.10.2011, 19:25 +0800 schrieb Ed Greshko: >>> I frankly (no pun intended) don't think "Beefy Miracle" is a name to be >>> proud of. >> >> I do. Even though I am vegetarian. > > My problem with the name is that it conveys two different things, none > of which I want in my linux distribution. > > The term "Beefy" does not chime with a lean and efficient distribution. Lean? Fedora? Shome mishtake shurely. > The term "Miracle" is something that is even worse. It is some > phenomenon that can not be explained (except by divinity). Do we really > want that in a linux distribution? I think that "miracle" is more often used as a metaphor. As a description of free (as in gratis) software that's better than software you have to pay for, "miracle" isn't entirely inappropriate. Andrew. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines