> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:06 +0200, Raphael Groner wrote: > > So, I don't see any needs for Adobe closed source binaries any more in > > a distribution that claims to be completely open and free. > > Flash is not "in" Fedora. The fact that Adobe provides a repo means nothing. > The official Fedora repos continue to be completely open and free, as you > put it. I just subscribed so not sure if someone's already mentioned it but this wiki page could use some love with these new developments: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash Josh -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
