JB wrote: > Frantisek Hanzlik <franta <at> hanzlici.cz> writes: > >> ... > > Just a wild guess if you want to try. > > Turn off ICMP redirect: > # echo "0' > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_redirects > # echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/send_redirects > > Flush arp cache: > # ip neigh flush all > > Flush the route cache: > # ip route flush cache > > Now try *separate* entries: > # ping -n -c 2 -I source_ip target_ip > # ping -n -c 2 -I source_if target_ip > > JB It is the same. My opinion was ping in case of "-I netdev" gets interface address (when it have only one, as in this case, this should not be a problem) and things further come in same manner as if I give "-I IPAddr" But ping behaves somehow else - for exact findings it would be necessary overview its souce code. Maybe it not specify source IP address - when I "ping -I eth1 target_ip", then I see at eth1 ARP requests for target_ip (although it not belong to eth1 network segment). OTOH: traceroute behaves fine and its syntax is IMO more obvious, both "traceroute -i eth1 target_ip" and "traceroute -i source_ip target_ip" works fine and packets goes thru proper interface. And it can specify separatelly to which device use and which source address use. Franta -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
