On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:42 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:10:39 -0400 > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream. > > It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it's no > > longer safe for inclusion in Fedora. > > Or maybe it just does a job, does it well, and needs no frenetic > change for the sake of change? I find it very difficult to believe that at no time in the last five years that no security vulnerabilities could have been identified in a Certificate Authority. I certainly wouldn't place my trust in it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
