Something is still On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Paul Allen Newell <pnewell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/8/2011 12:42 AM, Andras Simon wrote: >> >> w3c's html validator is unlikely to signal problems with your >> javascript (and no validator could if the problem is not a syntactic >> one). > > Andras: > > Thanks for reply. > > Regarding the validator, your comment was/is understood before I wrote > my email ... Not quite, perhaps. > I mentioned it only to ensure that I wasn't tripping up on > bad html that validator would pick up. Using 4.01 Strict, if it matters. Well, outside the fact that even strictly standard html provides hooks for conformant ways to add non-conformant tags, yeah, conformance matters. The web standards have been open-ended from the beginning on purpose. It's a kind of hidden sub-text in the discussions, one of those proverbial elephants in the room. (Confused me for a long time, too.) >> It's probably not a Win XP vs Fedora but an IE vs Firefox question. >> Have you tried FF on Win XP? Or other browsers on Fedora? >> >> Andras > Everything is in Firefox on Win XP and F14 (don't want cliched apples > and oranges problem by dealing with IE). Both systems are running > Firefox 3.6.18 (Windows XP is 32bit, F14 is both 32 and 64). > > Paul Direct-X? Even two distinct installs of Fedora 14 are likely to have distinct sets of libraries installed, and the java/ECMAscript interface to the OS libraries is a bit fuzzy. It goes without saying that you must have checked that you have the same set of add-ons loaded in each. Right? Shoot. Without a look at your source code, I would be hard-pressed to even suggest a proper forum for you among those that are dedicated to the various ways to mix HTML, CSS, ECMAscript, server-side tech, and so forth. Joel Res -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
