On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 09:42 +0200, Andras Simon wrote: > w3c's html validator is unlikely to signal problems with your > javascript (and no validator could if the problem is not a syntactic > one). I'll go further and say that it won't. It's not just unlikely. It looks at HTML not JavaScript. It might check whether you've called JavaScript in a syntactically correct way (e.g. that you've put your OnMouse-whatever's into the right part of the HTML elements), but not the functions that are in your JavaScript. Their HTML validator checks HTML. Their CSS validator checks CSS. They don't have a validator for JavaScript, and I've not heard of anyone that does (which goes some way to explaining the huge amount of crap JavaScript on the WWW that just doesn't work in my browser - because there is no standard test for JavaScript, and authors just dream up whatever seems to work on the browser they're playing with). There are standardised ECMA scripts, but browsers do their own thing with their own scripting, and authors are still stuck playing that silly game of having to code differently for specific browsers. Additionally, if the original poster wants more eyes looking at their problem, they really need to supply some samples of the problems. As others have said, it's most likely a browser issue. JavaScript nearly always is (that, or an authoring error). There are news groups that deal with web authoring that might be your best bet, but put on your flameproof suit, they'll be far more critical than I've been. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
