On 07/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 03.07.2011 03:31, schrieb JD: > >>> so what will you tell us? >>> that you are a noob and picking some documents you do not understand? >>> everybody here has realized this long ago! >>> >> And you ignore: >> "...JavaScript has a more troubling history of security holes...." >> http://www.w3.org/Security/Faq/wwwsf2.html > i ignore nothing > > i understand the difference of faulty implementations / bugs and your > dumb implication "javascript can access my local drive" because you seen > a file:// url from your routers interface without realize that javascript > is not involved there and does only the document.location-call > > security problems in implementations has NOTHING to do with > your braindead rant by starting this thread! > Just the contrary. Security is my main concern. Just as the article mentions. That "troubling history" of security holes in javascript is in and of itself a much stronger conviction of wrongdoing than I have provided. Calling it "bugs" is laughable at best. On just the face of it - browsing to a web site, resulting in code getting pushed to user's machine, executed on user's machine is insecurity itself, no matter how hard the promoters scream and shout that it is safe. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
