On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 02:23 +0930, Tim wrote: > Is a corporation going to want to spend $100 per graphics card per PC, > so that the default Gnome 3 actually works, or are they going to > continue to only want to put in the $20 graphics card? (That just won't > work with the new all-singing, all-dancing, Gnome 3.) So there's the > next RHEL with Gnome shot down in flames. > > Likewise, the *average* home user faces the same quandary, and most > people buy underpowered computers. So that's Fedora out of the > question. I have an "underpowered" computer running integrated Intel graphics (read: the cheapest of the cheap). The open-source Intel drivers work just fine with Gnome 3/Gnome Shell. (Actually, I have more trouble with the NEWER Intel cards, like those on the Sandy Bridge architecture). Despite how flashy things look, the Gnome folks did a really quite impressive job of limiting the hardware requirements to a very reasonable set of 3D functions that should be present on most machines built in the last four years at least.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
