On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 11:46 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:49:45PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:35 +1000, Nathan Delboux wrote: > > > Does anyone know if the Classic Gnome would become an option to use if > > > we don't like Gnome 3? or are just used to Gnome classic? > > > > > > I'm all for change and don't really mind which way that Fedora heads > > > but i heard Ubuntu may have it an option with their Unity interface. > > > Good to keep the options open > > > > > > You're not likely to get much traction for this. The GNOME team doesn't > > really want to continue supporting the 2.x line. You'll get some bugfix > > support for it if you're running RHEL or its clones, but I highly doubt > > that anyone is going to be sufficiently interested to maintain a > > complete desktop environment that's abandoned by its upstream. > > Sorry? > > We have GNOME fallback in 3.x. The GNOME panel appearance has been > changed to match the way GNOME shell looks, but 1) you can change that > and 2) it is maintained. Due to all the platform changes, a few applets > weren't ported in 3.0, but there will be more applets in 3.2. > > A lot of work has gone into GNOME panel and GNOME applets, totally > opposite from being abandoned. I was talking about the actual Gnome 2 desktop environment, not fallback mode (which if I understand correctly is more of a skin on top of Gnome 3 than an actual feature-for-feature replica of Gnome 2)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
