I just enabled IPv6 on my DSL router and nicely got an non-tunneled IPv6 address from my provider. After enabling IPv6 in NM it tried getting a IPv6 address using DHCPv6. As I dont need DHCP for IPv6 I configured the connection in NM to 'automatic'. When I check with ifconfig I see that I actually have a working IPv6 address but NM itself does not list it. The connection information for IPv6 is empty. Checking with dmesg a see that NM (?) still issues the DHCPv6 command (which fails) while the interface already got a working address. NetworkManager[25794]: <info> dhclient started with pid 25823 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.2.0-P2 Copyright 2004-2010 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/ Bound to *:546 Listening on Socket/eth0 Sending on Socket/eth0 PRC: Requesting information (INIT). XMT: Forming Info-Request, 0 ms elapsed. XMT: Info-Request on eth0, interval 970ms. XMT: Forming Info-Request, 970 ms elapsed. XMT: Info-Request on eth0, interval 2010ms. XMT: Forming Info-Request, 2980 ms elapsed. XMT: Info-Request on eth0, interval 4130ms. XMT: Forming Info-Request, 7110 ms elapsed. XMT: Info-Request on eth0, interval 8030ms. XMT: Forming Info-Request, 15150 ms elapsed. XMT: Info-Request on eth0, interval 15730ms. XMT: Forming Info-Request, 30900 ms elapsed. XMT: Info-Request on eth0, interval 32510ms. NetworkManager[25794]: <warn> (eth0): DHCPv6 request timed out. NetworkManager[25794]: <info> (eth0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP client pid 25823 Before I go to bugzilla, is this expected behavior ? Thanks, Jurgen -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
