On 05/24/2011 05:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/25/2011 08:23 AM, Konstantin Svist wrote: >> Does btrfs finally have a fully functional fsck? Or is btrfs install not >> recommended for the faint of heart? >> >> Last time I tried btrfs (~year ago), FS got corrupted after a kernel >> oops. Luckily it was only a test machine. >> >> > From the release announcement..... > > Btrfs filesystem -- Btrfs, the next generation filesystem is being > developed with upstream participation of Red Hat developers, Oracle > and many others. Btrfs is now available as a menu item in the > installer (only for non-live images. live images support just Ext4) > and does not require passing a special option to the installer as in > the previous releases. Btrfs availability has moved up a notch as a > incremental step towards the goal of Btrfs as the default filesystem > in the next release of Fedora. The btrfsck program for performing > filesystem checks is under active development upstream with > participation from Fedora but the one included in this release is > still limited and hence users are highly recommended to maintain > backups when using this filesystem (backups are a good idea anyway!). > Thanks to Josef Bacik, Red Hat Btrfs developer, for his upstream > participation and integration of this feature in Fedora including a > yum plugin (yum-plugin-fs-snapshot) that enables users to rollback > updates if necessary, taking advantage of Btrfs snapshots. Aaah, okay. So that's a "no" -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
