2011-05-24 19:11, harlequix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx skrev: > > > Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > > On 05/24/2011 08:33 PM, Nat Gross wrote: > 1. Thank you ALL for the > quick positive response! > > 2. I am a bit confused as to when to > use 32 bit components on a 64 bit > os. Besides Flash, Java has the > same option, and many more. On the 64 > bit architecture, would I > use 64 bit Java as well? Yes. The only components that you would use > 32-bit ones are typically proprietary stuff like Skype. Flash does > have a 64-bit version available Rahul -- users mailing list > users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription > options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > Yes, but the the flash plugin is afaik outdated. Native 64-bit flash > support has always been a pain in the ass, so you might consider running > the 32-bit version. That is not my experience. When I run 32 bit version it crased constantly while with 64 bit version I have no problem. I am running version 10.3.162.29 with build date 2011-05-13. I am getting this from: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/flashplayer.x86_64/ > -- > Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. > -- Regards Jon Ingason -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
