On 05/17/11 18:07, g wrote: > On 05/17/2011 11:44 PM, JD wrote: > <> > >> You call youtube a credible publication? > yes/no. > > they do have all different ways of cracking wep, wpa, and wpa2 > that are mentioned in this thread. > > just a few from my bookmarks, which where easy to find via a little > google time; > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdJuXtjgIrA&feature=related > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG9i2VPY_LE&NR=1 > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lNqqryPBNU&NR=1 > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P8l-PsvYak&NR=1 > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP1BOZqrp5g&feature=related > > along with a few non youtube; > > http://hackerwhacker.com/ > http://whacker2.hackerwhacker.com/ > http://wi-foo.com/ > http://www.linux-wireless.com/Sniffers/ > > all of which goes to show, if you want to spend a little time to > find out how to hack wlan/wifi, spend a little time on google. > > Well, I hate to disappoint anyone, but until I see a credible security researchers/professors show in a scientific publication that they were able to crack wpa2-psk/AES using PC's and in reasonable time (say a few days), then I would believe it. Youtube is no source of truth. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
