On 05/16/11 23:42, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:35 PM, JB<jb.1234abcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> JB<jb.1234abcd<at> gmail.com> writes: >> On Powerbook machine >> >> # /sbin/netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire >> default 192.168.1.254 UGSc 8 0 en1 >> 127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0 >> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 4 lo0 >> 169.254 link#6 UCS 0 0 en1 >> 192.168.1 link#6 UCS 2 0 en1 >> 192.168.1.1 0:26:18:6:ef:7 UHLW 0 113 en1 566 >> 192.168.1.60 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 0 lo0 >> 192.168.1.254 0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1 UHLW 15 153 en1 565 >> >> snip >> >> Let's try a ping from Fedora to Powerbook. >> >> snip >> >> But, the situation is curious, because we have ping's IPv4-format packet with >> FROM IPv4 address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface > If you're referring to "192.168.1.254 0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" as "FROM IPv4 > address and TO IPv4 address going out thru IPv6-type interface" then > no. "0:1d:5a:c8:91:c1" is the MAC address of "192.168.1.254". Well guys, the router is either getting constantly hacked (not too far fetched), or it simply has buggy firmware. I would rather go that route (pun not intended) than think that there is something inherently wrong with two wireless machines, one with no firewall, and one with firewall disabled, on the same subnet, being unable to talk to each other, but able to talk to everything else. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
