On 04/22/2011 06:17 PM, James Wilkinson wrote: <> > Without nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in the same process as <> > With nspluginwrapper, Firefox plugins run in separate processes. <> ahhh. yes. you refreshed the brain cells. [should stick this time] this was discussed in a 'support-firefox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' thread last year. > Presumably, this also means that the plugins can run on separate > hardware threads¹: whether this makes any difference to browser > responsiveness is something I have neither investigated nor seen anyone > else investigate. one would think so. this ability was not discussed. -- peace out. tc.hago, g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
