On 04/16/2011 02:32 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 07:20 -0700, JD wrote: >>> Any other pdf editors available that are quick and work? >>> Well there is good news and bad news. The program xournal can edit >> pdf >>> files. But the bad news is that xournal is needed to read the file. >> Huh??? >> Sorry, I feel rather slow this morning :) >> Could you please explain the "bad news" part? >> >> I mean, every editor must first "read" the file it will >> edit into a memory buffer, display it on the screen >> and then accepts edit commands. Or am I missing >> something? > No I made a mistake. I missed the Export to pdf option so I thought > after you edited the pdf with xournal you couldn't save it as a regular > pdf file. That is clearly not true so there is no bad news. Well, it turns out there indeed is bad news. Xournal does not or cannot save the edited pdf file in pdf format. It saves it in it's own format - with .xoj extension. That is indeed bad news because if I send the .xoj document to someone, s/he will not be able to open it. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines